Ah, I remember those things! The WERE a redesign of an existing gasoline engine (not a converted one, but based on existing designs), and on top of the problems you describe they had a distressing tendency, at least in the early ones, to spin a rear main bearing every 25,000 miles or so. I remember considerable problems with head cracks too, but that's not exclusive to the Olds design by any stretch -- most manufacturers of pre-chamber diesels have head problems until they work out how to keep the stresses controlled. Benz had horrible problems in the 60's when they took over the design from their original supplier.

They also suffered from catastrophic IP failure due to inadequate fuel filtering (in those days, most diesel equipment had twin filters AND a settling bowl) and owner ignorance of the need for constant fuel filter inspection. Doesn't take much water to bash the IP, and you are correct, the quality of diesel fuel in those days was deplorable.

Interestingly, they DO last almost forever when you get a good one -- a friend of my old boss had one with 200,000 miles on it -- basically a Oldsmobile Cutlass "replica" made of rust and pop-riveted sheetmetal with a decent diesel in it. I've also heard the do very well in constant speed applications (irrigation pumps, for example), running for decades of use.

GM had mountains of engineering problems during that era, mostly due to non-engineers monkeying with the design work (as in substituting head bolts to suit equiment that wasn't ever going to work -- Roger Smith had decided to use robots instead of human workers). The aluminum block in the Vega was a perfect example -- Benz still uses the technology, and it works wonderfully. GM botched the actual production design by "cheaping" it to death -- to say nothing of the horrendous quality of the body.

The Olds diesel had a couple of problems that became insurmountable -- bearings too small and very low power for the displacement -- it should have produced around 300 hp and 500 ft/lbs of torque (with a turbo, of course) -- unfortunately, I don't believe the engine as it was built would hold up with a turbo.

Otherwise, not a bad design -- timed injection (a rarity in US manufacture, even today) and a wide enough rpm band to put in a car with a normal tranny. Too bad GM didn't bother to finish the work on it....

Peter



Reply via email to