606NA gets better mileage than the turbo. EPA figures are not pessimistic for the w210. I do not know what they did to mess it up, but the W124 OM606 has power and poise, as well as economy. The 606 in the w210s I looked at were anemic and the cars sloppy. Is that build issues or age?
clay On Jun 23, 2013, at 9:23 AM, Mitch Haley wrote: > Curt Raymond wrote: >> EPA says 23/31. In a Jetta that'd be a 2002/2003 and EPA 35/44 and I could >> get a manual transmission which I prefer on principle. > > Anybody with turbo 606 experience want to comment? > I was under the impression that it could at least equal a W124 2.5 turbo on > the freeway. > > Mitch. > > _______________________________________ > http://www.okiebenz.com > For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
