My coupes are both turbos but I drove a NA coupe once and it actually had decent performance. I think they may be a bit more reliable and easier to maintain with better longevity than the turbo. I would expect 29 mpg, not 39. They are heavy cars after all, the coupes are listed as only 80 lbs lighter than the sedan. I wish MB had produced a 115 diesel coupe. Did I mention that I really like the W115? Cheers, Bruce
Donald Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Luther wrote: Jeepers, the ePay mileage disease is spreading!!! 39MPG?????? http://albuquerque.craigslist.org/car/114428095.html What are these non-turbo 123's like. I really like the look of this car and the color. But, I have never driven one of these without a turbo. What are they like? Are they dogs? More reliable? Donald H. Snook _______________________________________ http://www.striplin.net For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net Bruce 82 300CD 334kmi 'His' 85 300CD 240kmi 'Hers' 75 240D 202kmi 'Donner' 77 240D 204kmi 'Blitzen' --------------------------------- Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 04 17:47:41 2006 Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.198.39] helo=rwcrmhc12.comcast.net) by server5.arterytc5.net with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EuCjd-00007Q-Dv for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 17:47:41 +0000 Received: from comcast.net (c-24-18-178-168.hsd1.wa.comcast.net[24.18.178.168](misconfigured sender)) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <2006010417473601500e5u02e>; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:47:36 +0000 Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 09:47:36 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553) From: redghost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Mercedes Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553) X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus Subject: Re: [MBZ] Spare 115 relays? X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Id: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes_striplin.net.striplin.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Archive: <http://striplin.net/pipermail/mercedes_striplin.net> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 17:47:41 -0000 The hazard relay? Gone bad? But it works and the other one is not. SO, just clean them both? On Wednesday, January 4, 2006, at 07:54 AM, Jim Cathey wrote: >> The relay makes the noise, the blink do not blink. The hazards work >> just fine and blink all around, even when the signal choses not not >> function. > > If the hazards are working perfectly and the indicators at > least light up the problem is most probably inside the hazard > switch/flasher relay unit. Open it up and sic the white > tornado on it. > > Frankenheap's hazards worked just fine even though the turn > signals often did not. Post-operation everything works. > > -- Jim > > > _______________________________________ > http://www.striplin.net > For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ > For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net > > -- Clay Seattle Bioburner 1972 220D - Gump 1995 E300D - Cleo 1987 300SDL - POS - DOA The FSM would drive a Diesel Benz
