I say we take off an nuke the whole site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

--R

On 6/13/15 7:28 PM, archer75--- via Mercedes wrote:
"....America won the Cold War in large part because the Russians knew that 
American avionics would give NATO control of the air in any prospective war; that 
the Pershing missiles in Germany and Italy gave NATO an advantage in any prospective 
nuclear exchange; and that the Reagan Strategic Defense Initiative portended a new 
range of technologies that Russia couldn’t match. China looked on from a distance 
and aligned itself with the dominant technological superpower.

If America wants to command China’s respect, it has to widen the technology 
gap, rather than watch it shrink. If China believed that its weapons systems 
were ineffective against American countermeasures, it would show far more 
caution. But the opposite is true: the technology gap is closing, and China 
knows it. America still has a technological lead and the resources to widen 
it–should it choose to do so. There is no obvious political constituency for 
such an effort though, and no prominent leader commited to doing so. A return 
to the Eisenhower-Kennedy-Reagan commitment to American technological 
superiority would also have enormously beneficial effects for America’s lagging 
productivity. But it is hard to persuade Americans that it is better to be 
tough than to sound tough.

Asia Times

_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to