Well said, and thank you.

That is the exact point I was attempting to drive to in terms of practical
use application.

Solar just isn't there, yet. If it ever will be remains to be developed at
some point in the future. If you live in one of the sunshine states, it is
costly, but practical, to cover the roof with solar panels into a grid tie
system. If you live in one of the "perpetual winter" states .. unlikely.

Solandra failed for good cause. Once the government tete dried up, the
corporate greed of management vaporized, the lack of substance became
visible... and it crashed.

Repeat as necessary until there are no more public funds available.

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Meade Dillon via Mercedes <> wrote:

> The key point that I am trying to drive home is the limit on the amount of
> solar power available.  This is a hard limit: ~1000 watts/square meter is
> the peak under ideal conditions.  A more usable number is 200 watts during
> daytime, which takes into account average cloud cover and reduced energy
> reaching ground when the sun is low in the sky.
> By comparison, 1 gallon of diesel has the potential energy of 130,000
> BTU's.  200 watts of solar power is the equivalent of about 3400 BTU's /
> hour.  That ~40 order of magnatude difference is why we drive cars and
> trucks with internal combustion engines and why we don't have solar cars
> (or airplanes) that can do useful things.  Diesel has ~40 times more energy
> density than solar power, comparing one gallon of diesel to one square
> meter of solar energy.
> -------------
> Max
> Charleston SC
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 2:11 AM, fmiser via Mercedes <
> wrote:
> >   As
> > pointed out, even 100% efficiency from the panels would not
> > be enough to sustain flight except at high noon in the
> > tropics on a sunny day.
> >
> >
> _______________________________________
> To search list archives
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:

To search list archives

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:

Reply via email to