Her actions, by direct and indirect admission, violate secret and above security clearance regulations. She seems to fail to believe she will be held accountable at this time. That belief does not relieve her of being held responsible, it only momentarily delays her ultimate punishment, what ever that may be.
Should a real leader take office of POTUS and appoint a real Attorney General, her account will be settled in a way that should make an example to others for a long time. I don't believe there is a statue of limitation on treason, or fraud, or murder. It appears there was an active participation in all three of those. Now... who was it that wanted a supply of "I'm ready for Hillary" bumper sticker? Mercedes question: I now have 2 full sets [5 rims each set] of 15 slot Mercedes rims in 15 inch. One set has been polished, one has not. Which should I use on my "new CD Coupe" restoration? Or, keep both sets and change them as my mood changes? On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Rich Thomas via Mercedes < mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > My wife was asking about the classified email stuff over the weekend. I > pointed out that when I had a security clearance (only SECRET not SI/TK) > had I done anything remotely close to what she has done -- brought home > classified info, emailed info, left info in an unsecured area, copied it to > unsecured media -- I would be in some federal prison somewhere, house, > cars, bank account, everything would be gone. And yet here we have a > person, who could not have been doing the job correctly without the > transmission of large amounts of classified info, day in day out, admitting > to having broken the law (no matter the parsing of words). It is just > plainly apparent that this stuff is some very serious criminal behavior. > And it is highly likely that all this information has fallen into the hands > of the bad guys, which is treasonous behavior. > > I can't stand the woman, but none of that behavior has nothing to do with > any political view. It is just practical application of the law that > applies to anyone with a security clearance and access to classified info. > If some low-level staffer in the comms section had been doing this, that > person would be bunking with "Chelsea" Manning at Club Fed right now. I > can understand the politics involved here, but that woman should be sitting > in a prison cell right now. > > --R > > > > On 8/30/15 11:16 AM, G Mann via Mercedes wrote: > >> If anyone other than Hillary had the same history of criminal involvement >> in an organized criminal enterprise over the past 40 plus years, all >> assets >> would be seized and RICO charges would be brought, trial would be held, >> and >> imprisonment would follow, for the maximum allowed by law. >> >> Both Bill and Hillary are a text book example of misusing the power of >> public office to manipulate, enrich themselves, control, and abuse power >> and trust. >> >> Only laying blame on their personal abuse of office, not any political >> party affiliation, and only looking at the facts, not speculation, logical >> conclusion can be made that ample evidence of a long standing criminal >> enterprise has been operated by them working in concert with others. >> >> Politics be damned, holding the vessel of public office does not give free >> pass to violate laws. >> >> This video is now on youtube, it runs 1:33 and while long, covers some of >> the back story of the Clintons. It has first party interviews [many] with >> people who observed illegal activity or participated in illegal activity >> with or at the direction of Clintons. If you watch it, draw your own >> conclusions. >> >> https://youtu.be/C8B43JOshC4 >> >> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Max Dillon via Mercedes < >> mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: >> >> Craig, >>> >>> The last line of the story has the sign owner speculating that >>> Republicans >>> may be stealing the signs. I have my doubts about that. >>> >>> I would consider buying a bumper snicker with his design! >>> >>> -- >>> Max Dillon >>> Charleston SC >>> '87 300TD >>> '95 E300 >>> >>> On August 30, 2015 10:42:28 AM EDT, Craig via Mercedes < >>> mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Your title is confused, Max. It's the democrats who are stealing the >>>> signs because they don't like what they say. >>>> >>>> >>>> Craig >>>> >>> _______________________________________ >>> http://www.okiebenz.com >>> >>> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ >>> >>> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: >>> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________ >> http://www.okiebenz.com >> >> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ >> >> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: >> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com >> >> >> > > _______________________________________ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
