The polished ones look "pimpy."

Wilton

----- Original Message ----- From: "G Mann via Mercedes" <mercedes@okiebenz.com>
To: "Mercedes Discussion List" <mercedes@okiebenz.com>
Cc: "G Mann" <g2ma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT politics: Republicans stealing Hillary signs


Her actions, by direct and indirect admission, violate secret and above
security clearance regulations. She seems to fail to believe she will be
held accountable at this time. That belief does not relieve her of being
held responsible, it only momentarily delays her ultimate punishment, what
ever that may be.

Should a real leader take office of POTUS and appoint a real Attorney
General, her account will be settled in a way that should make an example
to others for a long time. I don't believe there is a statue of limitation
on treason, or fraud, or murder. It appears there was an active
participation in all three of those.

Now... who was it that wanted a supply of "I'm ready for Hillary" bumper
sticker?

Mercedes question:  I now have 2 full sets [5 rims each set] of 15 slot
Mercedes rims in 15 inch. One set has been polished, one has not. Which
should I use on my "new CD Coupe" restoration?  Or, keep both sets and
change them as my mood changes?

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Rich Thomas via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:

My wife was asking about the classified email stuff over the weekend.  I
pointed out that when I had a security clearance (only SECRET not SI/TK)
had I done anything remotely close to what she has done -- brought home
classified info, emailed info, left info in an unsecured area, copied it to
unsecured media -- I would be in some federal prison somewhere, house,
cars, bank account, everything would be gone.  And yet here we have a
person, who could not have been doing the job correctly without the
transmission of large amounts of classified info, day in day out, admitting
to having broken the law (no matter the parsing of words).  It is just
plainly apparent that this stuff is some very serious criminal behavior.
And it is highly likely that all this information has fallen into the hands
of the bad guys, which is treasonous behavior.

I can't stand the woman, but none of that behavior has nothing to do with
any political view.  It is just practical application of the law that
applies to anyone with a security clearance and access to classified info.
If some low-level staffer in the comms section had been doing this, that
person would be bunking with "Chelsea" Manning at Club Fed right now.  I
can understand the politics involved here, but that woman should be sitting
in a prison cell right now.

--R



On 8/30/15 11:16 AM, G Mann via Mercedes wrote:

If anyone other than Hillary had the same history of criminal involvement
in an organized criminal enterprise over the past 40 plus years, all
assets
would be seized and RICO charges would be brought, trial would be held,
and
imprisonment would follow, for the maximum allowed by law.

Both Bill and Hillary are a text book example of misusing the power of
public office to manipulate, enrich themselves, control, and abuse power
and trust.

Only laying blame on their personal abuse of office, not any political
party affiliation, and only looking at the facts, not speculation, logical
conclusion can be made that ample evidence of a long standing criminal
enterprise has been operated by them working in concert with others.

Politics be damned, holding the vessel of public office does not give free
pass to violate laws.

This video is now on youtube, it runs 1:33 and while long, covers some of the back story of the Clintons. It has first party interviews [many] with
people who observed illegal activity or participated in illegal activity
with or at the direction of Clintons. If you watch it, draw your own
conclusions.

https://youtu.be/C8B43JOshC4

On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Max Dillon via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:

Craig,

The last line of the story has the sign owner speculating that
Republicans
may be stealing the signs.  I have my doubts about that.

I would consider buying a bumper snicker with his design!

--
Max Dillon
Charleston SC
'87 300TD
'95 E300

On August 30, 2015 10:42:28 AM EDT, Craig via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:

Your title is confused, Max. It's the democrats who are stealing the
signs because they don't like what they say.


Craig

_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com




_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to