I know that Next Gen episode. Scotty is trapped in a Dyson Sphere. So, as it relates to my conundrum, it would not be like Kirk and Spock going back to save the Whales, or Picard and NCC 1701 E going back to save Zephram Cochran from the Borg. I would have to be entangled on a quantum level to teleport to anyplace. I and the SDL would go POOF! in a manner that deletes the original and recreates it in the new location? Does this also satisfy the conservation of energy? I am not really creating or destroying anything. It just works? God is not rolling the dice with the universe?
If I am going to have to deal with wizards or aliens and their comings and goings, they are just as likely to be using the flue network as they are to be moving backward and returning along the timeline? That must mean that the cost to go next door is much the same as it would be for me to get in the SDL and zip back to 1986. Does the effect…? Well, it must, if going down the street is the same as moving 30 years, I can just show up with the SDL in Dallas in 1986 as I am to run into Marty McFly in his Delorean at prom with his parents. > On Jan 29, 2017, at 9:33 PM, archer75--- via Mercedes <mercedes@okiebenz.com> > wrote: > > Quantum entanglement is of considerable interest in physics nowadays; as well > as quantum teleportation theories which are part of it: > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Quantum Entanglement Could Stretch Across Time > > In the weird world of quantum physics, two linked particles can share a > single fate, even when they’re miles apart. > > Now, two physicists have mathematically described how this spooky effect, > called entanglement, could also bind particles across time. > > If their proposal can be tested, it could help process information in quantum > computers and test physicists’ basic understanding of the universe. > > “You can send your quantum state into the future without traversing the > middle time,” said quantum physicist S. Jay Olson of Australia’s University > of Queensland, lead author of the new study. > > In ordinary entanglement, two particles (usually electrons or photons) are so > intimately bound that they share one quantum state — spin, momentum and a > host of other variables — between them. One particle always “knows” what the > other is doing. Make a measurement on one member of an entangled pair, and > the other changes immediately. > > Physicists have figured out how to use entanglement to encrypt messages in > uncrackable codes and build ultrafast computers. Entanglement can also help > transmit encyclopedias’ worth of information from one place to another using > only a few atoms, a protocol called quantum teleportation. > > In a new paper posted on the physics preprint website arXiv.org, Olson and > Queensland colleague Timothy Ralph perform the math to show how these same > tricks can send quantum messages not only from place to place, but from the > past to the future. > > The equations involved defy simple mathematical explanation, but are > intuitive: If it’s impossible to describe one particle without including the > other, this logically extends to time as well as space. > > “If you use our timelike entanglement, you find that [a quantum message] > moves in time, while skipping over the intermediate points,” Olson said. > “There really is no difference mathematically. Whatever you can do with > ordinary entanglement, you should be able to do with timelike entanglement.” > > Olson explained them with a Star Trek analogy. In one episode, “beam me up” > teleportation expert Scotty is stranded on a distant planet with limited air > supply. To survive, Scotty freezes himself in the transporter, awaiting > rescue. When the Enterprise arrives decades later, Scotty steps out of the > machine without having aged a day. > > “It’s not time travel as you would ordinarily think of it, where it’s like, > poof! You’re in the future,” Olson said. “But you get to skip the intervening > time.” > > According to quantum physicist Ivette Fuentes of the University of > Nottingham, who saw Olson and Ralph present the work at a conference, it’s > “one of the most interesting results” published in the last year. > > “It stimulated our imaginations,” said Fuentes. “We know entanglement is a > resource and we can do very interesting things with it, like quantum > teleportation and quantum cryptography. We might be able to exploit this new > entanglement to do interesting things.” > > One such interesting thing could involve storing information in black holes, > said physicist Jorma Louko, also of the University of Nottingham. > > “They show that you can use the vacuum, that no-particle state, to store a > lot of information in just a couple of atoms, and recover that info from > other atoms later on,” Louko said. “The details of that have not been worked > out, but I can foresee that the ideas that these authors use could be adapted > to the black hole context.” > > Entanglement in time could also be used to investigate as-yet-untested > fundamentals of particle physics. In the 1970s, physicist Bill Unruh > predicted that, if a spaceship accelerates through the empty space of a > vacuum, particles should appear to pop out of the void. Particles carry > energy, so they would be, in effect, a warm bath. Wave a thermometer outside, > and it would record a positive temperature. > > Called the Unruh effect, this is a solid prediction of quantum field theory. > It’s never been observed, however, as a spaceship would have to accelerate at > as-yet-unrealistic speeds to generate an effect large enough to be testable. > But because timelike entanglement also involves particles emerging from > vacuums, it could be used to conduct more convenient searches, relying on > time rather than space. > > Finding the Unruh effect would provide support for quantum field theory. But > it might be even more exciting not to see the effect, Olson said. > > “It would be more of a shocking result,” Olson said. “If you didn’t see it, > something would be very wrong with our understanding.” > > https://www.wired.com/2011/01/timelike-entanglement/ > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Quantum Teleportation > ....Quantum teleportation provides a mechanism of moving a qubit from one > location to another, without having to physically transport the underlying > particle that a qubit is normally attached to. Much like the invention of the > telegraph allowed classical bits to be transported at high speed across > continents, quantum teleportation holds the promise that one day, qubits > could be moved likewise. However, as of 2013, only photons and single atoms > have been employed as information bearers.... > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_teleportation#Non-technical_summary > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > clay wrote: >> Climate change or the wizards? >> I know there is a bunch of top level science knowledge on this list, and I >> want to know what the heck would really happen with teleportation. It seems >> like the movies just bypass the reality of what takes place and … Poof!, you >> get Scotty to beam you up. Driving the W126 pushes a bunch of air. #1 boy >> tells me that single use teleportation would have no impact. ie. pulling a >> blade of grass from a lawn does not create a statistically significant >> change. But the constant yanking of stalks of grass must do something. A >> solution posited here was that you move in a container. So, I am poofed in >> the SDL. What takes its place from where I left, and what of where I land? >> Do I need to drive to a teleportation station that will provide reciprocal >> matter transmission? >> >> Maybe I remove a tablespoon of power steering fluid and put it in the >> transmission. Do I need to remove the same volume of ATF to put back in the >> steering pump? The dang movies never show that! Star Trek has fancy lights >> that shimmer when they teleport. Is that the O2 in the Enterprise being >> sent to the dead Red shirt on the planet while Kirk and the other guys bring >> xenobacteria back? >> >> >> OR! Was it all just there in the beginning with the big bang and will still >> be there when the whole mess falls apart into the constituent sub atomic >> parts in absolute 0 Kelvin? As it is, the SDL seems on an accelerated pace >> of entropy which I am fighting on a weekly basis. >> >> clay _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
