so, in Canada, is the client in this case able to collect from the lawyers for malfeasance, or incompetence?

Randy Bennell via Mercedes <mailto:mercedes@okiebenz.com>
February 7, 2020 at 2:21 PM
I wonder if the reference to working late in the old movies and tv shows might have been an effort to show that these folks were hard working and successful? With a show like Perry Mason, I don't think that portraying him as working in the evenings would be unusual. He was a litigator - a court room lawyer and I would expect that a lot of those folks do work evenings and weekends preparing for the next day of a trial and meeting with clients and witnesses to prepare them. I just read a case where the lawyers very obviously failed to properly prepare or test their expert witness to their detriment. They called their client's accountant and qualified him as an expert witness to testify as to losses sustained by the client due to the actions of the defendant. Their witness was totally unable to explain how he had arrived at his conclusions. The defence lawyer cut him to pieces in cross examination and the Judge basically said his testimony was worthless and as a result, there was no evidence to support the plaintiff's claim. The lawyers should have spent more time with him to be sure that he knew his stuff and could support his conclusions with calculations based upon some facts. In the alternative, they would have learned that he could not be relied upon and found someone else to testify on behalf of their client.

RB



_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to