Pretty much, although the information that Rick just posted about the county in 
MI that was audited points out the discrepancies that exist when there aren’t 
proper controls in place and the poll workers or elections officials aren’t 
properly trained.

-D

> On Dec 17, 2020, at 9:07 AM, Kaleb Striplin via Mercedes 
> <mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> 
> So basically it sounds like the election was not “hacked” last time and it 
> wasn’t the time either. It is simply the media spun it and hyped it up as 
> being hacked before, but this time is spinning it that there is no way it 
> could be hacked. 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Dec 17, 2020, at 5:53 AM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes <mercedes@okiebenz.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Working with the SOE (supervisor of elections) here I can calm your fears.
>> 
>> As previously stated, a nation state, most likely the Russians, did breach 
>> several state’s voter registration databases aound the 2016 election. While 
>> problematic for a lot of reasons, doing so had no effect on the actual 
>> voting process.
>> 
>> The actual voting systems, which vary from state to state, are always “air 
>> gapped” in the sense that voting machines are never, ever connected to the 
>> Internet or any network of any kind. As described by others, ballots are 
>> typically printed out for each voter as they register or check in at a 
>> polling place, filled out by the voter, then scanned by a completely 
>> stand-alone voting machine. The votes tabulated in that machine are 
>> collected on a memory card or other means of electronic storage that is 
>> encrypted using state of the art encryption protocols. There is a clearly 
>> defined chain of custody involving the handling of the machines, memory 
>> cards, ballots and anything else involved in the process.
>> 
>> When auditing the results, paper ballots marked by the voters are scanned by 
>> a machine and tabulated separately to compare with the results tabulated by 
>> the voting machines.
>> 
>> It’s a very, very highly controlled process that has changed little over the 
>> years. Most states and municipalities continue to use a paper ballot of some 
>> sort in order to provide a hard copy of the votes - I’m not aware of anyone 
>> who does it 100% electronically, although there may be somewhere.
>> 
>> The stories about massive numbers of votes being added/removed and such are 
>> bogus. The process simply doesn’t have the capacity for such alterations, 
>> and even if someone tried it, the audits done using the physical paper 
>> ballots would quickly reveal any discrepancies. Mistakes do happen, and 
>> they’re typically identified in short order when audits are performed and 
>> corrected on the spot. It’s still a very manual process everywhere I know 
>> of, and that’s one of the reasons why the integrity of the process has been 
>> preserved.
>> 
>> -D
>> 
>>> On Dec 17, 2020, at 2:09 AM, Scott Ritchey via Mercedes 
>>> <mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> My current NC county as well as my previous FL county used this system.  
>>> After marking a paper ballot the voter feeds it into a reader which 
>>> indicates that the ballot was accepted (read OK) or rejected (spit back 
>>> out).  Accepted ballots are held within the machine.  This is the best 
>>> system I know: simple, cheap, secure and auditable.  Anything more complex 
>>> facilitates fraud, IMO.
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From:  Kaleb Striplin via Mercedes,  Wednesday, December 16, 2020 11:33 PM
>>> 
>>> Here in our state you get a paper ballot that you color in the squares to 
>>> vote. Then feed it into a machine that scans it and counts it. Even though 
>>> a machine counts it, you still have a physical paper that can be hand 
>>> counted later. Are other states totally electronic?
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________
>>> http://www.okiebenz.com
>>> 
>>> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>>> 
>>> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
>>> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________
>> http://www.okiebenz.com
>> 
>> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>> 
>> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
>> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 


_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to