IIRC, there was a factory recall on the rodbenders to address this problem.

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 12:41 PM dan penoff.com via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:

> 300SDL version was prone to water jacket leaks in the head/head gasket, as
> I recall. There were later heads (014?) that were redesigned to address the
> issue. 350SDLs had leakage problems as well that when extreme, would cause
> the #1 cylinder (typically) to hydrolock, causing the connecting rod to
> bend. I also recall that there could be issues with cylinder wear, with
> significant oil consumption being the tell (more than 1 quart/1,000 miles,
> as I recall.)
>
> Correct me on any of this as necessary, my memory is a bit sketchy on
> these as it’s been a while since I’ve dealt with any of them.
>
> -D
>
> > On Feb 13, 2024, at 10:36 AM, Randy Bennell via Mercedes <
> mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 13/02/2024 11:33 AM, dan penoff.com via Mercedes wrote:
> >> I thought they were the same engine but the 350SDL had 210 ci versus
> 183 ci for the 300SDL? I believe the displacement difference would have
> been a change in both bore and stroke.
> >>
> >> Different heads, too, as I recall.
> >>
> >> -D
> >>
> > Did they share the problem, or was one worse than the other?
> >
> > Randy
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________
> > http://www.okiebenz.com
> >
> > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> >
> > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> >
>
> _______________________________________
> http://www.okiebenz.com
>
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>
>
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to