> On Sep 21, 2016, at 17:05, Arun Kulshreshtha <kulsh...@fb.com> wrote:
> On 9/21/16, 11:08 AM, "Augie Fackler" <r...@durin42.com> wrote:
>> On Sep 21, 2016, at 13:50, Pierre-Yves David
>> <pierre-yves.da...@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
>> On 09/21/2016 07:31 PM, Augie Fackler wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 01:35:22PM -0700, Arun Kulshreshtha wrote:
>>>> # HG changeset patch
>>>> # User Arun Kulshreshtha <kulsh...@fb.com>
>>>> # Date 1474318006 25200
>>>> # Mon Sep 19 13:46:46 2016 -0700
>>>> # Node ID f157d9becfe724d624e0f3328febe58c5694d950
>>>> # Parent 0bb030bb1ce94c5514b671a3900ba207ebb19269
>>>> dispatch: make hg --profile wrap reposetup
>>> This makes sense to me. Queued.
>>> (I shiver a little bit at threadlocals, but what can you do? Sigh.)
>> Yuya raised multiples valid question when reviewing V2 and it is unclear
>> they have all been addressed especially since the discussion where still
>> going on in V2 after V3 was sent).
>> Did you checked the status of this series with Yuya ?
> No, because I saw a v3 and discarded the entire v2 discussion, assuming v3
> resolved the things discussed in v2.
>> Pierre-Yves David
> Is it possible to undo the accept? To repeat, Yuya made further comments on v2
> after I had already sent out v3 addressing his first set of comments. This
> doesn’t address the latest feedback so it shouldn’t be published yet.
> Sorry about the confusion.
Ugh, I thought I had done that, but it turns out obsolete markers and bookmarks
play poorly in a way I didn't know about. It's fixed now.
Mercurial-devel mailing list