> On Sep 21, 2016, at 17:05, Arun Kulshreshtha <kulsh...@fb.com> wrote: > > > > > On 9/21/16, 11:08 AM, "Augie Fackler" <r...@durin42.com> wrote: > > >> On Sep 21, 2016, at 13:50, Pierre-Yves David >> <pierre-yves.da...@ens-lyon.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 09/21/2016 07:31 PM, Augie Fackler wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 01:35:22PM -0700, Arun Kulshreshtha wrote: >>>> # HG changeset patch >>>> # User Arun Kulshreshtha <kulsh...@fb.com> >>>> # Date 1474318006 25200 >>>> # Mon Sep 19 13:46:46 2016 -0700 >>>> # Node ID f157d9becfe724d624e0f3328febe58c5694d950 >>>> # Parent 0bb030bb1ce94c5514b671a3900ba207ebb19269 >>>> dispatch: make hg --profile wrap reposetup >>> >>> This makes sense to me. Queued. >>> >>> (I shiver a little bit at threadlocals, but what can you do? Sigh.) >> >> Yuya raised multiples valid question when reviewing V2 and it is unclear >> they have all been addressed especially since the discussion where still >> going on in V2 after V3 was sent). >> Did you checked the status of this series with Yuya ? > > No, because I saw a v3 and discarded the entire v2 discussion, assuming v3 > resolved the things discussed in v2. > >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> Pierre-Yves David > > > Is it possible to undo the accept? To repeat, Yuya made further comments on v2 > after I had already sent out v3 addressing his first set of comments. This > version > doesn’t address the latest feedback so it shouldn’t be published yet. > > Sorry about the confusion.
Ugh, I thought I had done that, but it turns out obsolete markers and bookmarks play poorly in a way I didn't know about. It's fixed now. _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
