On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Martijn Pieters <m...@zopatista.com> wrote:
> > Nice refactor. While I haven't looked at the code in detail yet, does
> check-code not complain about the use of underscore_function_names?
> Apparently not! I did run the whole test suite, and ran it again just now.
> Nested function names are locals and exempt from the rule it appears.
> Should I resend with adjusted function names?
Unless I'm missing something obvious, you should.
And my guess is someone will patch the style checker to catch nested
function names :)
Mercurial-devel mailing list