On 10/12/2016 03:07 PM, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Yuya Nishihara <y...@tcha.org>
# Date 1476131409 -7200
# Mon Oct 10 22:30:09 2016 +0200
# Node ID 4960509763a61ae3710346131f218cf3bf3f3d32
# Parent 30b2ca4bcf3588de9d949b3eefb2669cb6f8a18a
revset: make follow() reject more than one start revisions
Taking only the last revision is inconsistent because ancestors(set) follows
all revisions given, and theoretically follow(startrev=set) == ancestors(set).
I'm planning to add a support for multiple start revisions, but that won't fit
to the 4.0 time frame. So reject multiple revisions now to avoid future BC.
Looking forward for that
len(revs) might be slow if revs were large, but we don't care since a valid
revs should have only one element.
Maybe we could use two iteration step to check that the second one is
empty? That would imply less computation if the set is large.
If this end up being a common need we could extend the smartrevset class
Mercurial-devel mailing list