> On Oct 17, 2016, at 13:45, Gábor STEFANIK <gabor.stefa...@nng.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kevin Bullock [mailto:kbullock+mercur...@ringworld.org]
>> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 8:37 PM
>> To: Gábor STEFANIK <gabor.stefa...@nng.com>
>> Cc: email@example.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] update: enable copy tracing for backwards and non-
>> linear updates
>>> On Oct 17, 2016, at 13:27, Gábor Stefanik <gabor.stefa...@nng.com>
>>> # HG changeset patch
>>> # User Gábor Stefanik <gabor.stefa...@nng.com> # Date 1472155346 -7200
>>> # Thu Aug 25 22:02:26 2016 +0200
>>> # Node ID a41abe53dbc2c28d3b656f2a138da26949cf91d3
>>> # Parent 3fc51a50bec71bb34c11beaaa6686d521ac706b1
>>> update: enable copy tracing for backwards and non-linear updates
>> Urk. It's generally confusing to send just one updated patch to the end of an
>> in-flight series (but it's good you at least flagged it v3).
>> Since 1-7 of the v2 series are queued already, can you resend current
>> versions of 8-12 as a v4?
> It was Pierre-Yves's request to separate the last patch from the series,
> since it's not related to graft.
> But if there's disagreement on this, I'm more than happy to have it treated
> as part of the series.
Fair enough, I wasn't aware of that. In that case I would've said to resend
just 8-11, but it's fine that you resent them as one chunk.
pacem in terris / мир / शान्ति / سَلاَم / 平和
Kevin R. Bullock
Mercurial-devel mailing list