On 10/17/2016 10:41 PM, Pierre-Yves David wrote:


On 10/17/2016 08:55 PM, Kevin Bullock wrote:
On Oct 17, 2016, at 13:45, Gábor STEFANIK <gabor.stefa...@nng.com>
wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Bullock [mailto:kbullock+mercur...@ringworld.org]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 8:37 PM
To: Gábor STEFANIK <gabor.stefa...@nng.com>
Cc: mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] update: enable copy tracing for backwards
and non-
linear updates

On Oct 17, 2016, at 13:27, Gábor Stefanik <gabor.stefa...@nng.com>
wrote:

# HG changeset patch
# User Gábor Stefanik <gabor.stefa...@nng.com> # Date 1472155346 -7200
#      Thu Aug 25 22:02:26 2016 +0200
# Node ID a41abe53dbc2c28d3b656f2a138da26949cf91d3
# Parent  3fc51a50bec71bb34c11beaaa6686d521ac706b1
update: enable copy tracing for backwards and non-linear updates

Urk. It's generally confusing to send just one updated patch to the
end of an
in-flight series (but it's good you at least flagged it v3).

Since 1-7 of the v2 series are queued already, can you resend current
versions of 8-12 as a v4?

Done.

It was Pierre-Yves's request to separate the last patch from the
series, since it's not related to graft.
But if there's disagreement on this, I'm more than happy to have it
treated as part of the series.

Actually, my initial request was to not include this one in the original
batch (and I missed the fact he did) and then to send that one when the
first series would be in.

However, This patch seems to work just fine with only the initial first
5 that are pushed. So resending it independently was a good idea.

So despite the general confusion on various sides, the end result of
Gábor sending this on its own ended up being pretty good. I've pushed
this patch.

Fair enough, I wasn't aware of that. In that case I would've said to
resend just 8-11, but it's fine that you resent them as one chunk.

For the record, I would have preferred that part of the series to not be
sent again as a V4. The V2 was still in review and no change had been
requested to it. Having it resent is increasing list traffic, patch
tracking work and confusion on my side for no visible benefit.
Kevin, any reason why you requested that ?

Ha, I just connected the dots. A V4 was sent to contains the update to the last patch. I got confused because that patch was in my mind independent and not included in that series at all. Sorry for the confusion and associated grumpyness.

Cheers,

--
Pierre-Yves David
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Reply via email to