On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:40:36 -0400, Augie Fackler wrote:
> > On Oct 18, 2016, at 09:38, Yuya Nishihara <y...@tcha.org> wrote:
> >> After coordinating on irc to figure out what this proposal actually
> >> is, I've noticed that the semantics of this "exact" proposal are
> >> exactly what "glob" does today, which means (I think) that
> >> "files:foo/bar" should be representable as "glob:foo/bar/*" - what am
> >> I missing?
> > Maybe we want a "glob" relative to the repo root?
> As far as I can tell, it already is. "relglob:" is relative to your
> location in the repo according to the docs.
Unfortunately that isn't.
'glob:<glob>' - a glob relative to cwd
'relglob:<glob>' - an unrooted glob (*.c matches C files in all dirs)
Don't ask me why. ;-)
Mercurial-devel mailing list