On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:32:40 +0000, Jun Wu wrote: > Excerpts from Gregory Szorc's message of 2016-11-07 09:29:40 -0800: > > Could we change basefilectx.annotate() to return a rich data structure > > instead of a list of tuples? That data structure could have the cached > > parents and other reusable cache data (which could be passed into > > subsequent calls if needed). > > It's already returning "fctx", which is rich...
True. To be clear, I don't like the idea to make the API more complicated just because our rich data structure "fctx" has a poor performance. _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel