On 11/14/2016 09:10 AM, Denis Laxalde wrote:
Pierre-Yves David a écrit :
How about "stability"? If it feels strange to only have it displayed
when there are "troubles", we may also insert it in the debug section as
`stability: stable`.
I do not think it is suitable, stability does not really fit for
"divergent" or "bumped" and too linked to "unstable"
In addition, trouble is really a list of 0-N element, "stable" have
nothing to do in it and imply a more binary "stable/unstable" mode.
Of course "stable" couldn't be listed as a trouble, but my proposal was
to introduce a term to qualify the stability state (or whatever you
prefer to name it) of a changeset. In other words, a changeset may be in
state that is either "<something meaning not unstable/divergent/bumped>"
or not. Having a name for this boolean state along with a name for the
not-troubled state would be useful in general I think.
We had something a bit similar as a template for a while (but not
exactly that irc), this end up confusing people from Google more than
bringing benefit so Martin and I scrapped it a couple of month back. We
could give is a second "better" try if you have a good usecase at hand,
For now that would be "troubled/untroubled" until we find something better
I really advise we move forward with trouble and have naming
discussion on another thread/wiki page.
I'm fine with this as well. Will send a V2 with the singular "trouble"
label.
I saw your V4, I'll get to it.
--
Pierre-Yves David
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
