On 11/23/2016 04:43 PM, Remi Chaintron wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Remi Chaintron <r...@fb.com>
# Date 1479915779 0
# Wed Nov 23 15:42:59 2016 +0000
# Branch stable
# Node ID f9ec5cd22586138cdcf5cfebc88f1bcba41a2a20
# Parent 819f96b82fa4c4c6d07840a2b180d112b524103f
censor: flag internal documentation
diff --git a/mercurial/help/internals/revlogs.txt
b/mercurial/help/internals/revlogs.txt
--- a/mercurial/help/internals/revlogs.txt
+++ b/mercurial/help/internals/revlogs.txt
@@ -88,7 +88,9 @@
0-5 (6 bytes)
Absolute offset of revision data from beginning of revlog.
6-7 (2 bytes)
- Bit flags impacting revision behavior.
+ Bit flags impacting revision behavior. The following bit offsets define:
+ 0
+ 'censor' extension flag.
The formating is a bit strange here, it seems like it is matching the
outer layer formatting but it seems less necessary for this 1 digit
data. Is there any formal reason we need it this way? Or could we move
to "0: 'censor' flag"
8-11 (4 bytes)
Compressed length of revision data / chunk as stored in revlog.
12-15 (4 bytes)
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
--
Pierre-Yves David
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
