3That changesets is a pure improvement, over the previous state, so I
took it. (I changed 'evolve:' into 'prune:' in the summary)
Can you followup with a series taking timeless input in account and
with some sort of document/pointing at the 'allowunstable' option?
On 12/12/2016 03:41 AM, timeless wrote:
I'm not going to stop this from going in, it's definitely an improvement.
@@ -3299,7 +3301,8 @@
head = repo[heads.first()]
if _disallowednewunstable(repo, revs):
raise error.Abort(_("cannot fold chain not ending with a head "\
- "or with branching"))
+ "or with branching"), hint = _("new unstable"\
+ " changesets are not allowed"))
1. From a UX perspective, I think I'd rather this be split. I think.
Users shouldn't have to figure out "am I branching" or "am I folding a
chain that doesn't end in a head".
Alternatively, I'm tempted to say "can only fold chains without
branches that end in a head"....
2. It'd be helpful if there was a wiki page or something that talked
about these cases, preferably such that searching for these error
messages led to it.
I'm not sure if I want it to be a wiki, or docs included w/ source,
but something somewhere...
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
--
Pierre-Yves David
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
