> On Dec 19, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Gábor STEFANIK <gabor.stefa...@nng.com> wrote:
> 
> Regardless of how big a footgun it turns out to be, or how well it can be 
> defootgunized
> by fixing bug 4404, it's no less a footgun for evolutionarily-linear updates 
> (where Hg
> already allows this behavior) than for evolutionarily-nonlinear ones.

Sigh. Sounds like we should proceed with a v2 then, probably after January 1st 
so we’ll have people’s attention. Once 4404 is fixed, I’d even entertain this 
as a default (as it would be safe).

Thanks,
Augie
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Reply via email to