Excerpts from Sean Farley's message of 2017-02-21 15:45:44 -0800: > Augie Fackler <r...@durin42.com> writes: > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 07:14:12PM -0800, Jun Wu wrote: > >> Excerpts from Bryan O'Sullivan's message of 2017-02-17 13:29:58 -0800: > >> > I think there are multiple topics being discussed: > >> > > >> > 1. How to solve the overhead loading hiddenrevs with minimal changes? > >> > 2. Why is the bitmap format interesting (future use-cases)? > >> > > >> For 2, > >> > >> len(filteredrevs) in my hg-committed is 2155. It's small. I tend to think > >> about solutions that scale longer and are not too complex to build. That > >> may or may not be a good habit. > >> > > > > For what it's worth, my clone of hg has 12716 hidden revisions - about > > a quarter of the entire repo history is hidden. > > Actually, that's 40%. Mine is a bit over 25%.
I think you have incorrectly excluded hidden revs from repo history: 12716.0 / (len(repo) - len(repo.changelog.filteredrevs) + 12716) = 28.8% # correct 12716.0 / (len(repo) - len(repo.changelog.filteredrevs)) = 40.3% # incorrect Yours should be around 20%: 8000.0 / (len(repo) - len(repo.changelog.filteredrevs) + 8000) = 20.3% _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
