Excerpts from Augie Fackler's message of 2017-03-30 12:43:31 -0400: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Jun Wu <qu...@fb.com> wrote: > > I'll drop it from patchwork and send a new version with better documentation > > and some planned fixes. The next version has a same core idea, but the > > interface is more formalized and is made future proof in mind. The interface > > changes are by myself and haven't been discussed here. > > > Actually, based on a quick discussion I had with Durham, can you check > with him before sending another volley? It'll help the reviewers if we > can keep the patch traffic on this topic at a lower rate until we > actually get some better understanding of where we want/need to go > architecturally. > > Thanks!
I'll chat with him today. Thanks! By the way, for series about histedit - I agree that marmoute was right, and rolling back is the right choice for now. So everything about histedit should be considered as "settled for now". A better solution about histedit *depends on* the "node versions" approach. So I may restart the histedit change if we have "node versions". The most interesting discussion to me is so-called "obscycles" (aka this series), but it's more precisely "node versions" as the first patch title suggests. "cycles" are just a subset of problems it solves <- this paragraph is for marmoute who might think I don't even understand my own patches. _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel