On 8/28/17 7:00 PM, Augie Fackler wrote:
On Aug 28, 2017, at 13:13, Durham Goode <dur...@fb.com
<mailto:dur...@fb.com>> wrote:
On 8/27/17 6:51 PM, Augie Fackler wrote:
It sounds like you whitelist read and unrecoverable-write
commands. Does that mean "ercoverable-write" commands are inferred
from not being in those two whitelists? How has that interacted with
users finding random extensions or defining custom aliases?
Yea, the default behavior is warn-the-user. Very, very few of our
users have ever enabled random extensions so that has not been an issue.
Hm, okay. Then one thing we should probably do is hoist these lists
into core, and make it so they're trivial to amend so that out-of-tree
extensions can correctly categorize their behavior. I'd imagine this
could have other value, so maybe it should be in the @command decorator?
I like the idea of adding this to the command decorator. I think that
will prevent new commands from being put into the wrong category.
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
