pulkit added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D939#17129, @ryanmce wrote: > I think we need to take a step back and think through how to implement this more robustly than we have currently done in the remotenames extension: > > - storage file names > - storage format > > I like that you've split branches and bookmarks, but I suspect that storing all paths in the same file isn't the best option. I like the JSON idea you mentioned in a previous patch. Can you explain your concern about "storing all paths in the same file"? REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D939 To: pulkit, #hg-reviewers, dlax, ryanmce Cc: ryanmce, dlax, mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
