martinvonz added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS
> test-split.t:487-493 > + | o 9:88ede1d5ee13 I > + | | > + | x 6:af8cbf225b7b G1 > + | | > + | x 3:be0ef73c17ad D > + | | > + | | o 8:74863e5b5074 H Leaving these two behind seems reasonable. It would also be reasonable to evolve/stabilize them. Either way, it's different from what "hg rebase" does. Do we eventually want them to behave the same? If so, are we okay with a small BC break here (either in split or in rebase)? REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1082 To: quark, #hg-reviewers Cc: martinvonz, dlax, mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
