martinvonz added a comment.
I wonder if we should instead have a --draft option for this. Reasons:
- If we ever add a fourth phase (like Jun's proposed "archived" phase), then
--no-secret doesn't clearly indicate "draft", it could just as well be
- Actually, we of course already do have a third phase. One could imagine a
"hg commit --public", although that's probably not useful enough to warrant its
own option, but it seems to suggest that "--no-secret" doesn't necessarily mean
- I find this tri-state boolean weird. "--secret" kind of defaults to off,
but it can be made "more off" with "--no-secret".
To: spectral, #hg-reviewers
Cc: martinvonz, mercurial-devel
Mercurial-devel mailing list