dlax added a comment.
lothiraldan (Boris Feld) wrote: > I have but I'm always very cautious when creating a new package with the > name of an old module. .pyc/.pycache files may still be there both for > Mercurial developers and for Mercurial users using their deb/rpm package. > > I may be wrong, but if we could avoid weird bugs, I would prefer put in > the utils package. Well, this is Python... Most people are aware of this kind of issues, I think. So the argument sounds a bit like FUD :) On the other hand, if we keep going that route, we'll have to live with util/utils "forever" just to have avoided this hypothetical inconvenience, is this more acceptable? REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2282 To: lothiraldan, #hg-reviewers Cc: dlax, martinvonz, mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
