On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 21:01:44 +0900, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:01:14 +0100, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> > Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > > # HG changeset patch
> > > # User Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <jef...@josefsipek.net>
> > > # Date 1519251311 18000
> > > # Wed Feb 21 17:15:11 2018 -0500
> > > # Node ID b99df94fdd4813e0ce538a8caa682802da4a6cb2
> > > # Parent 106872aa15af9919220705ed72c78459774e1575
> > > mdiff: split on unicode character boundaries when shortening function name
> > >
> > > Splitting the raw bytes may lead to truncating the string in the middle
> > > of a
> > > UTF-8 character which would lead to the generated diff containing an
> > > invalid
> > > byte sequence even though the original data had none. For example, the
> > > Unicode codepoint U+308B (る) gets represented as \xe3\x82\x8b in UTF-8.
> > > Before this change a diff on i18n/ja.po would yield:
> > >
> > > @@ -28953,7 +28953,7 @@ msgstr "Mercurial と SSH を併用す<E3><82>
> > >
> > > After this change, the output is cleaner:
> > >
> > > @@ -28953,7 +28953,7 @@ msgstr "Mercurial と SSH を併用する場合の注意点:"
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mercurial/mdiff.py b/mercurial/mdiff.py
> > > --- a/mercurial/mdiff.py
> > > +++ b/mercurial/mdiff.py
> > > @@ -348,7 +348,12 @@ def _unidiff(t1, t2, opts=defaultopts):
> > > # alphanumeric char.
> > > for i in xrange(astart - 1, lastpos - 1, -1):
> > > if l1[i][0:1].isalnum():
> > > - func = ' ' + l1[i].rstrip()[:40]
> > > + func = l1[i].rstrip()
> > > + try:
> > > + func = func.decode("utf-8")[:40].encode("utf-8")
> > > + except:
> > > + func = func[:40]
> > I'd suggest catching exception types explicitly (UnicodeDecodeError and
> > UnicodeEncodeError I guess) and avoid "bare" except.
> > (No idea if the change itself is correct by the way.)
> Nah, it's wrong to assume external world is always UTF-8. It might be okayish
> to split func as a UTF-8 as best effort, but which shouldn't involve encoding
Yeah... I thought that might be an issue. The code in the 'except' is meant
as best-effort - if there is any UTF-8 issue decoding/encoding, just fall
back to previous method. That of course wouldn't help if the input happened
to be valid UTF-8 but wasn't actually UTF-8.
I had to do the encode step, otherwise I got a giant stack trace saying that
unicode strings cannot be <something I don't remember> using ascii encoder.
(Leaving it un-encoded would also mean that this for loop would output
either a unicode string or a raw string - which seems unclean.)
I'm not really sure how to proceed. Most UTF-8 decoders should handle the
illegal byte sequence ok, but it still feels wrong to let it make a mess of
valid data. The answer might be to just ignore this issue. :|
All science is either physics or stamp collecting.
- Ernest Rutherford
Mercurial-devel mailing list