Ryan McElroy <r...@fb.com> writes: > On 2/20/18 11:44 PM, Sean Farley wrote: >> Ryan McElroy <r...@fb.com> writes: >> >>> # HG changeset patch >>> # User Ryan McElroy <rmcel...@fb.com> >>> # Date 1519040197 28800 >>> # Mon Feb 19 03:36:37 2018 -0800 >>> # Node ID 6b80188783ee2626030113a9b2319f2fd14a8119 >>> # Parent 905b79d62df82d8ca16ecac175e6236fe959f4ed >>> Back out "remotenames: push anonymous head if --force is given" >>> >>> Original commit changeset: 905b79d62df8 >>> >>> There are already two ways to do this: >>> * set remotenames.forcecompat = True >>> * set remotenames.pushanonheads = True >>> >>> The backed out revision violated the expectation of someone who does not >>> have >>> forcecompat = true. It also did not have any tests. >> I actually quite liked this, to be honest. Those settings are fairly >> unintuitive settings and --force is the de facto way to override a push >> on the client. >> >> Also, it seems you pushed this less than a day (which was a holiday!) of >> it being on the list. That's seems a bit rushed, no? > > Sorry I'm out of touch with US holidays. I pushed in draft phase and I'm happy > to drop them all.
It's alright. I was thinking of maybe just going ahead and splitting the extension up before this sprint. We can just punt on this and discuss it there.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
