On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 01:32:13 +0530, Sushil khanchi wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanch...@gmail.com> > # Date 1521655571 -19800 > # Wed Mar 21 23:36:11 2018 +0530 > # Node ID d63af67f326c7478e062d55fd508012beb164a6e > # Parent b6a4881cec1937a8d9cd2e9bbbdf5ca31cfa73dd > remove: add dry-run functionality > > diff -r b6a4881cec19 -r d63af67f326c hgext/largefiles/overrides.py > --- a/hgext/largefiles/overrides.py Sun Mar 18 15:32:49 2018 -0400 > +++ b/hgext/largefiles/overrides.py Wed Mar 21 23:36:11 2018 +0530 > @@ -271,9 +271,11 @@ > bad.extend(f for f in lbad) > return bad > > -def cmdutilremove(orig, ui, repo, matcher, prefix, after, force, subrepos): > +def cmdutilremove(orig, ui, repo, matcher, prefix, after, force, subrepos, > + dryrun): > normalmatcher = composenormalfilematcher(matcher, repo[None].manifest()) > - result = orig(ui, repo, normalmatcher, prefix, after, force, subrepos) > + result = orig(ui, repo, normalmatcher, prefix, after, force, subrepos, > + dryrun) > return removelargefiles(ui, repo, False, matcher, after=after, > force=force) or result
Can you add a test for largefiles? I think removelargefiles() would have unwanted effect on --dry-run. _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
