indygreg created this revision.
Herald added a subscriber: mercurial-devel.
Herald added a reviewer: hg-reviewers.

REVISION SUMMARY
  There were two "testconflictingrequestid" methods. Naturally this isn't
  an error in Python. And by our luck, the test was failing.
  
  So we rename the test and fix it to pass.
  
  As part of this, _sendsingleframe() now takes a frame, not a string
  describing the frame. This is better because action at a distance can
  be confusing.

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2950

AFFECTED FILES
  tests/test-wireproto-serverreactor.py

CHANGE DETAILS

diff --git a/tests/test-wireproto-serverreactor.py 
b/tests/test-wireproto-serverreactor.py
--- a/tests/test-wireproto-serverreactor.py
+++ b/tests/test-wireproto-serverreactor.py
@@ -174,8 +174,8 @@
         ])
 
 class ServerReactorTests(unittest.TestCase):
-    def _sendsingleframe(self, reactor, s):
-        results = list(sendframes(reactor, [ffs(s)]))
+    def _sendsingleframe(self, reactor, f):
+        results = list(sendframes(reactor, [f]))
         self.assertEqual(len(results), 1)
 
         return results[0]
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@
     def testunexpectedcommandargument(self):
         """Command argument frame when not running a command is an error."""
         result = self._sendsingleframe(makereactor(),
-                                       b'1 command-argument 0 ignored')
+                                       ffs(b'1 command-argument 0 ignored'))
         self.assertaction(result, 'error')
         self.assertEqual(result[1], {
             'message': b'expected command frame; got 2',
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@
     def testunexpectedcommanddata(self):
         """Command argument frame when not running a command is an error."""
         result = self._sendsingleframe(makereactor(),
-                                       b'1 command-data 0 ignored')
+                                       ffs(b'1 command-data 0 ignored'))
         self.assertaction(result, 'error')
         self.assertEqual(result[1], {
             'message': b'expected command frame; got 3',
@@ -340,19 +340,32 @@
     def testmissingcommandframeflags(self):
         """Command name frame must have flags set."""
         result = self._sendsingleframe(makereactor(),
-                                       b'1 command-name 0 command')
+                                       ffs(b'1 command-name 0 command'))
         self.assertaction(result, 'error')
         self.assertEqual(result[1], {
             'message': b'missing frame flags on command frame',
         })
 
-    def testconflictingrequestid(self):
+    def testconflictingrequestidallowed(self):
         """Multiple fully serviced commands with same request ID is allowed."""
-        results = list(sendframes(makereactor(), [
-            ffs(b'1 command-name eos command'),
-            ffs(b'1 command-name eos command'),
-            ffs(b'1 command-name eos command'),
-        ]))
+        reactor = makereactor()
+        results = []
+        results.append(self._sendsingleframe(
+            reactor, ffs(b'1 command-name eos command')))
+        result = reactor.onbytesresponseready(1, b'response1')
+        self.assertaction(result, 'sendframes')
+        list(result[1]['framegen'])
+        results.append(self._sendsingleframe(
+            reactor, ffs(b'1 command-name eos command')))
+        result = reactor.onbytesresponseready(1, b'response2')
+        self.assertaction(result, 'sendframes')
+        list(result[1]['framegen'])
+        results.append(self._sendsingleframe(
+            reactor, ffs(b'1 command-name eos command')))
+        result = reactor.onbytesresponseready(1, b'response3')
+        self.assertaction(result, 'sendframes')
+        list(result[1]['framegen'])
+
         for i in range(3):
             self.assertaction(results[i], 'runcommand')
             self.assertEqual(results[i][1], {



To: indygreg, #hg-reviewers
Cc: mercurial-devel
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Reply via email to