indygreg added a comment.

  In, @durin42 wrote:
  > This seems to break things with git, which is what's on gcc112. 
Should we just ratchet our test requirements forward, or try and figure out 
what changed?
  You can drop it for now. I don’t think it is important to the series. I was 
just poking around as part of investigating a test failure.

  rHG Mercurial


To: indygreg, #hg-reviewers, durin42
Cc: mercurial-devel
Mercurial-devel mailing list

Reply via email to