indygreg added a comment.

  In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3117#50998, @durin42 wrote:
  
  > This seems to break things with git 1.8.3.1, which is what's on gcc112. 
Should we just ratchet our test requirements forward, or try and figure out 
what changed?
  
  
  You can drop it for now. I don’t think it is important to the series. I was 
just poking around as part of investigating a test failure.

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3117

To: indygreg, #hg-reviewers, durin42
Cc: mercurial-devel
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Reply via email to