smf added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2873#52021, @indygreg wrote: > Looks good! I'm very heavily against this direction. Changing the behavior of push (even in this extension) is something I've always considered outside the scope of remotenames. Having another extension that changes push behavior (e.g. bookmark-push) is where I think this should go so that remotenames is just that: keeping track of remote names. REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2873 To: pulkit, #hg-reviewers, indygreg Cc: smf, indygreg, mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurialfirstname.lastname@example.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel