smf added a comment.

  In, @indygreg wrote:
  > Looks good!
  I'm very heavily against this direction. Changing the behavior of push (even 
in this extension) is something I've always considered outside the scope of 
remotenames. Having another extension that changes push behavior (e.g. 
bookmark-push) is where I think this should go so that remotenames is just 
that: keeping track of remote names.

  rHG Mercurial


To: pulkit, #hg-reviewers, indygreg
Cc: smf, indygreg, mercurial-devel
Mercurial-devel mailing list

Reply via email to