smf added a comment.

  In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2873#52021, @indygreg wrote:
  
  > Looks good!
  
  
  I'm very heavily against this direction. Changing the behavior of push (even 
in this extension) is something I've always considered outside the scope of 
remotenames. Having another extension that changes push behavior (e.g. 
bookmark-push) is where I think this should go so that remotenames is just 
that: keeping track of remote names.

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2873

To: pulkit, #hg-reviewers, indygreg
Cc: smf, indygreg, mercurial-devel
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Reply via email to