On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 19:41:32 -0400, Matt Harbison wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Matt Harbison <matt_harbi...@yahoo.com>
> # Date 1523027627 14400
> #      Fri Apr 06 11:13:47 2018 -0400
> # Node ID 6d8c47590030244033d51c2d0b390d2ee6337dea
> # Parent  acd5a25c179269df689b8799aa7cbc52d5451251
> lfs: add the 'Authorization' property to the Batch API response, if present
> 
> The client copies all of these properties under 'header' to the HTTP Headers 
> of
> the subsequent GET or PUT request that it performs.  That allows the Basic 
> HTTP
> authentication used to authorize the Batch API request to also authorize the
> upload/download action.

I'm not pretty sure, but I think it's up to the client to resend an
Authorization header depending on the realm provided by the server. Doesn't
the server request authentication for batch requests?
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Reply via email to