On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 08:25:07 -0400, Matt Harbison wrote:
> 
> > On Apr 16, 2018, at 7:35 AM, Yuya Nishihara <y...@tcha.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 02:44:08 -0400, Matt Harbison wrote:
> >> # HG changeset patch
> >> # User Matt Harbison <matt_harbi...@yahoo.com>
> >> # Date 1523752111 14400
> >> #      Sat Apr 14 20:28:31 2018 -0400
> >> # Node ID 3b0c3d4939b56ca038dbbba17da424699a6b339d
> >> # Parent  691a7d3f2df80908e52a170897a4492a528c3533
> >> verify: invoke the file prefetch hook
> >> 
> >> It's unfortunate that verify wants to download everything.  Maybe we can 
> >> create
> >> a custom transfer handler for LFS.  But it shouldn't be painful in the 
> >> meantime,
> >> and it's likely that blobs will be served up from more than just hgweb.
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/mercurial/verify.py b/mercurial/verify.py
> >> --- a/mercurial/verify.py
> >> +++ b/mercurial/verify.py
> >> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ from . import (
> >> 
> >> def verify(repo):
> >>     with repo.lock():
> >> +        scmutil.fileprefetchhooks(repo, repo.set('all()'))
> >>         return verifier(repo).verify()
> > 
> > I don't think "hg verify" should go that abstraction level because the
> > repository might be inconsistent state.
> 
> Do you mean using a revset, or prefetching at all?  Grabbing one file at a 
> time will likely be painfully slow.
> 
> If the revset bit is the bad part, what is the alternative with a corrupt 
> repo?

I think we should avoid any write operation on damaged repo. Is there any way
to disable fetching at all?
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Reply via email to