lothiraldan added a comment.

  In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3715#58383, @durin42 wrote:
  
  > I'm in favor, but feel like I've got enough conflict of interest I 
shouldn't land the patches.
  >
  > @smf @lothiraldan this might be of interest to both of you?
  
  
  The proposition of making namespaces behave differently than branches, and 
potentially making two namespaces behave differently (one with `multinode=True` 
and the other with `multinode=False`) make my spider sense tickle. But I will 
take time to see the exact implications of that series.

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3715

To: martinvonz, #hg-reviewers, durin42
Cc: durin42, smf, lothiraldan, mercurial-devel
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Reply via email to