lothiraldan added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3715#58383, @durin42 wrote: > I'm in favor, but feel like I've got enough conflict of interest I shouldn't land the patches. > > @smf @lothiraldan this might be of interest to both of you? The proposition of making namespaces behave differently than branches, and potentially making two namespaces behave differently (one with `multinode=True` and the other with `multinode=False`) make my spider sense tickle. But I will take time to see the exact implications of that series. REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3715 To: martinvonz, #hg-reviewers, durin42 Cc: durin42, smf, lothiraldan, mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel