lothiraldan added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3700#58404, @durin42 wrote: > In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3700#58403, @lothiraldan wrote: > > > In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3700#58376, @durin42 wrote: > > > > > I see some what, but not any why. Why is this useful? > > > > > > I need this changeset to integrate the mercurial test runner with some external tools. > > > I'd still like more information. Why is the json report inadquate? What's your goal? > > (Remember my perspective: every feature here is a liability, so anything we're not using for development on Mercurial is something I'm hesitant to take on in run-tests) I'm trying to integrate Mercurial with a new test format I'm developing called LITF (https://github.com/Lothiraldan/litf). The LITF test format is stream-based while the json report, while having the needed information, only dumps a file at the end. Moreover, the format is not final yet, I would like to avoid generating unnecessary noise on the phabricator / mailing-list. REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3700 To: lothiraldan, #hg-reviewers Cc: durin42, mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
