On 4/16/19 11:08 PM, martinvonz (Martin von Zweigbergk) wrote:
martinvonz added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6255#91019, @martinvonz wrote:
> In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6255#91015, @marmoute wrote:
>
> > I did a first path through it, the new code seems reasonable and easier
> > to read than the previous one. Some comments and questions below.
>
>
> The rest somehow didn't make it here, so I'll copy from the email (i.e.
the below is from Pierre-Yves, not from me):
>
> > Some timings for calculating mergecopies between two revisions (all
> > using the common ancestor as base):
>
> Which revisions did you pick?
The revisions are those before the colon, so e.g. from hg version 4.0 to 4.8. Oops, the first line there should say "4.8 4.9", not "4.8 4.8". I've fixed that now.
Can you give that a shot with the two revisions we use in the benchmark
suite, this is a pair expensive with the current algorithm.
1daa622bbe42 76caed42cf7c
--
Pierre-Yves David
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
