pulkit added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6490#94627, @khanchi97 wrote: > In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6490#94625, @mharbison72 wrote: > > > LGTM, thanks. > > > > Minor nit that I don't care too much about, but I'm wondering what others think of `not-head changeset` vs `non-head changeset`. The latter sounds more natural to me, but I'm not sure if there's another example of this phrasing. > > > Yes, I was also confused between these two phrasing when writing the patch. `non-head` sounds more natural to me too (not sure why I picked first one :P ). What others think about it? Let's go with `non-head`. Also the commit title needs to be changed to `commit: add --force flag..` instead of `branch: add --force flag..` REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6490 To: khanchi97, #hg-reviewers, mharbison72 Cc: pulkit, mharbison72, mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
