martinvonz added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS
> taapas1128 wrote in state.py:215 > the special handling is given so that `checkunfinished()` and > `clearunfinished()` bypass `bisect` completely.(see line 93 D6501 > <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6501> the comment above unfinishedstates) > And reportonly flag is not required because for `morestatus` uses > `getrepostate()` which is itself a report only feature. Note that I didn't suggest changing `getrepostate()` -- I said (or tried to say) that I would like `checkunfinished()` and `clearunfinished()` to not have handle bisect specially. > taapas1128 wrote in test-graft.t:282 > that is done in D6504 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6504>. Do you want me > to fold that here? I thought we had agreed (at least Pulkit seemed to agree with me) to add a third argument for the multi-line message for verbose status. That should mean that no tests would need to change. REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6503/new/ REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6503 To: taapas1128, durin42, #hg-reviewers, martinvonz Cc: mjpieters, martinvonz, pulkit, mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel