pgossman added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS
> martinvonz wrote in rebase.py:1808-1810 > Oh, right, that bug... I agree that it's good that this patch preserves that > behavior to avoid doing multiple things in one patch. But I think the current > behavior is pretty surprising. I'm curious what you think since you > apparently use `hg rebase --keep` (I don't). Bookmarks don't affect my use case for `--keep`, however, I agree the behavior was surprising and it would seem more intuitive if `--keep` did not move bookmarks. REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6880/new/ REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6880 To: pgossman, martinvonz, #hg-reviewers, pulkit Cc: mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
