kevincox added inline comments. kevincox accepted this revision. INLINE COMMENTS
> status.rs:76 > + > + results.sort_by(|a, b| a.0.cmp(&b.0)); > + Ok(results) It would be more clear to do `.sort_by_key(|e| e.0)` And I don't think stability matters here so you could use `sort_unstable_by_key`. REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7927/new/ REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7927 To: Alphare, #hg-reviewers, marmoute, kevincox Cc: marmoute, durin42, kevincox, mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
