Hi This is a bit different topic, but I would like to know whether the observed behavior is to be expected.
I create a small git-repo (script attached) I clone it via: hg clone git-repo hg-repo in hg-repo I add a new bookmark and some commits (script attached) I export a patch of corresponding to the bookmark/branch via Steve's recommendation hg export -g -r "only(pretty,master)" -o mypatch.patch I import that patch into the git repo via git am --patch-format=hg mypatch.patch Now git log --graph gives me * commit 36d22cdb51e6c8cc3395347d53756392ad311e2a | Author: Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es> | Date: Sat Sep 17 08:17:35 2016 +0000 | | pretty1 | So the patch is considered as 1 commit not as three. Just in case I repeat step one+two I create a small git-repo (script attached) I clone it via: hg clone git-repo2 hg-repo2 And apply the patch in hg-repo2. As expected hg log -G Shows three commits. Is there anything I miss?
git init echo default1 > test.txt git add test.txt git commit -a -m "default1" echo default2 > test.txt git commit -a -m "default2" echo default3 > test.txt git commit -a -m "default3" git log --graph
hg bookmark pretty echo pretty1 > pretty.txt hg add pretty.txt hg commit -m "pretty1" echo pretty-three >> pretty.txt hg commit -m "Pretty three" echo pretty-four >> pretty.txt hg commit -m "Pretty four"
_______________________________________________ Mercurial mailing list Mercurial@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial
