Am 07.12.2008 um 13:43 schrieb codethief:
> >>> There still is - but as your repository setup is not supported, it > might be dynamically deactived and therefore not shown. > > I still can't find it (although I certainly don't have nested repos, > now). But the menu entry is still called "Add to .hgignore", isn't it? That seems to be a bug. It's now called ignore, but it is not activated for me as well. I will look into it - should be a small thing. > > >>> Storing passwords is hard. Even though Eclipse 3.4 supports a >>> pseudo- > encrypted password store, this is a) not really save and b) not > compatible with Eclipse 3.3. That's why we currently don't persist > passwords, but only store them in memory. Therefore, we need the > authentication fields in the wizards. > > Oh, alright. Would be cool though to have the usernames stored and > assigned to a repository at least. > Nevertheless, you're also storing it in the URL, don't you? So it > can't be only in the memory...? No, to make it clear again: we don't store passwords in files. We store a stripped URL that doesn't contain authentication information. But we save the username additionally. So a saved repository looks like this: ssh://bitbucket.org/bastiand/mercurialeclipse@@@hg "@@@hg" says that the user "hg" should be used. > > >>> As for adding repositories, I wouldn't want this in the wizards - >>> this > would just clutter the interface even more. You can add repositories > by using the repository browser view, and perhaps in the future in a > project property page. > > Yeah, I rather meant to have a button in the wizards which directly > opens the "add a new repository" wizard (so that one doesn't always > have to open the project settings / repository view). Yeah, I know, but it would be the 5th or so button in these wizards. You can leave repositories view open, btw. > > >>> If you have a default repository defined in your hgrc file, this is > preselected. This, at least, works for me :). > But what about adding an option in MercurialEclipse? If I wanted to > use Mercurial directly via config files and console I wouldn't have > installed MercurialEclipse. ;) > This is a hard one. I'm not a fan of manipulating config files, but I understand your need :). So I won't write a configurator for Mercurial, as this would lead to all sorts of problems like handling conflicts and I would rather like to work on other stuff... But I would accept such a thing as a contribution :). Another thing I could imagine is storing a default flag in Mercurial Eclipse itself, but this otoh would be redundant functionality which is not too nice, either. Bastian > > Regards, > Simon > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MercurialEclipse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mercurialeclipse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
