hi Greg thanks a lot for your answer :)
In between I found this page http://stevelosh.com/blog/entry/2009/8/30/a-guide-to-branching-in-mercurial/ which nicely presents the different options available. He notably says, about branches : "In the past there was also the problem of not having a way to “close” a branch, which means that over time the list of branches could get huge. This was fixed in Mercurial 1.2 which introduced the --close- branch option for hg commit." However, I didn't see this option in mercurial eclipse (yet ^^).. > The thing that kills performance is having lots of heads. So if you > create 1000 named branches that never get merged, that will affect > performance. (Although less in Mercurial 1.4, now that we have > persistent tag caching.) hum, thanks for the tip about many heads. It increases my willingness not to have too many of them ! thanks again ++ zedros -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MercurialEclipse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mercurialeclipse?hl=en.
