Roman,

The main idea of using the scripts without OR is to have my scripts dynamic.
If i want to automate any other project I can just copy paste the common
functions and finish the scripts just like that. This would save about 70%
of the scripting time (considering that no new functions are required).
So just in case thought of considering the xML repository. However I'm not
sure whether XML repos. would help my scripts or not.

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Roman Zilber <[email protected]> wrote:

> Why you don't want to use regular object repository? I have application
> with 500 screens, and it works fine except some dynamic objects.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:04 PM, alll fun <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Everybody,
>>
>> Being a mute spectator of the group, I would like to ask a question from
>> my part too about repositories in QTP.
>> I have my own framework (though its simple) without the usage of object
>> repository and using the Description.Create method to capture the objects
>> with its unique properties.
>> The object properties has been parameterized throughout.... Since the
>> application has about 25 different screens (every navigation is treated
>> with different name by the developer :( ) the parameterization through
>> Datatable is bit slow at times. Some one was saying to look at the XML
>> repository method.
>>
>> Have anybody used such repository type? How far it is helpful in
>> "Description.Create" kind of programming. I googled for this but results did
>> not make me happy.
>> Any help on this is highly appreciated.
>>
>> --
>> With Cheers and smiles...
>> Swaminathan.S.P
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>


-- 
With Cheers and smiles...
Swaminathan.S.P

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
"QTP - HP Quick Test Professional - Automated Software Testing"
group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/MercuryQTP?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to