Thanks alot Alexey!!! One more time this group has the best solution!!!
On 15 sep, 03:11, Алексей Онучин <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not to use Reporter.ReportEvent instead of Standard QTP Checkpoint? > Just get the needed property and write a simple IF-THEN-ELSE to check for > pass/fail. And then use Reporter.ReportEvent with micPass or micFail. I > think it's better than Standard Checkpoint. > > 2009/9/14 Jose <[email protected]> > > > > > Hi All, > > > I´m still working on the field validation issue (http:// > > groups.google.com/group/mercuryqtp/browse_thread/thread/ > > dba9c4d0803c540f<http://groups.google.com/group/mercuryqtp/browse_thread/thread/%0Adba...> > > ). > > > I have performed Dhanasekar´s suggestions and finally I´m able to > > validate the asterisk color and get a "Pass / Fail" result via > > VBscript. > > Now, I´m trying to generate a checkpoint in order to validate that > > result and display it at the summary as a "Pass / Fail step", is this > > possible? > > > If not... i have figured out that the WebElements corresponding to > > mandatory asterisks (red color) and delayed mandatory asterisks (blue > > color) can be identified referring to the object class (red asterisk > > class = txtred // blue asterisk class = txtblue), but when I create a > > Standard Checkpoint, the "class" property is not listed at Checkpoint > > Properties setup. > > Is there any way to add the "class" property to it? > > > Any feedback will be really appreciated. > > > Thanks in advice. > > > Jose. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google "QTP - HP Quick Test Professional - Automated Software Testing" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/MercuryQTP?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
