Usually for automating Excel people don't use QTP. Is there special reason
you don't use automation with COM?

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:06 AM, manjunath biradar
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Abhijeet,
>
> Below are the details of the automation i am working on...
>
> QTP version : 9.5
> Excel 2007
> OS: WinXp
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Abhijeet <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Manjunath,
>>
>> My answer here is based on what I worked on. I don't know upto what
>> extent you have automated this application. So, some of the points
>> here may also be redundant / useless to you.
>>
>> 1. The automation strategy will depend on office version also. Which
>> version of excel / office are you using ? The reason for this question
>> is office 2007 is way different than the office XP, and needs
>> different ways of navigating.
>>
>> For the navigation purposes, it's always best to use the shortcut keys
>> for automation. Let's assume the addin has the shortcut of "ALT+X+P"
>> to be able to navigate. You can notice the difference, in office 2007,
>> you just have to press ALT key once, and release, and then you can
>> press X and P as and when required. You don't have to hold on to the
>> ALT key. In office XP version, you have to hold on to the ALT key
>> until you are done.
>>
>> 2. WPF : Are you using QTP 9.5 or 10 ? Ideally it should be QTP 10. Do
>> you have the latest patch installed ? The latest patch is called
>> something like "patch 38" (QTPNET_00038).I don't have it's proper name
>> right now. Also, make sure that you refer to the documentation of the
>> patch, as for this patch it is required that a particular patch (I
>> believe QTPNET_00015) for wpf SHOULD NOT be present while installing
>> this new patch.
>>
>> Please check the link :
>> http://www.sqaforums.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=625380&an=0&page=0
>>
>> Also try to find out from the HP resource center if they have any new
>> patch for WPF. They keep on releasing new patches regularly based on
>> tickets. If you are facing problems about QTP identifying some objects
>> properly and not the others, chances are some of the object
>> properties / methods are not exposed by the developers, and if it is
>> proper, then you can work with HP to open up a ticket.
>>
>> - Abhijeet
>>
>>
>> On May 31, 1:26 pm, manjunath biradar <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I am facing a peculiar problem.. I have an add-in in the excel to be
>> > automated and when i try object identification i am able to see only the
>> > "Book1" being recognized and everything else is identified as an object.
>> I
>> > have the wpf addin with licensed version but no luck...
>> >
>> > The addin is built with Wpf objects. Even tried creating a new object
>> set by
>> > selecting Wpf standard object but no luck,
>> >
>> > So can one please advise on this.. as i have a very tight deadline to
>> > finish. :)
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> > Xpressmusic
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> "QTP - HP Quick Test Professional - Automated Software Testing"
>> group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<mercuryqtp%[email protected]>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/MercuryQTP?hl=en
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> "QTP - HP Quick Test Professional - Automated Software Testing"
> group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<mercuryqtp%[email protected]>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/MercuryQTP?hl=en
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
"QTP - HP Quick Test Professional - Automated Software Testing"
group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/MercuryQTP?hl=en

Reply via email to